Becoming un-Baptist Part 5: Almost Anglican
In
my previous posts, I discussed how I had ceased to be a Baptist (church
leadership, theology of baptism, and the practice of baptism). As I was departing the Baptist fold, I nearly
became an Anglican. In the Anglican Church,
I found a more ancient from of liturgy than is practiced among Baptists. The worship was centered upon the
Eucharist. There was a prayer book that
provided a vocabulary and a direction for my prayers. I also had (and still have) friends who are
Anglican. Even more important for me, I
found pieces of the Fathers in the worship service and was able to feel
something of a connection with the Christian Tradition.
My
wife and I enjoyed our fellowship within the Anglican churches we
attended. However, we never quite became
Anglicans (for which I am thankful). At
the same time that we were attending Anglican churches, I was continuing to
undergo some significant doctrinal disruptions. Not only was I finding myself being
un-Baptist, but in some ways, I was becoming un-Protestant. This can be problematic when attending a
Protestant church.
Could
there have been room for me in the Anglican Communion? Probably, if I had found a conservative
Anglo-Catholic parish and remained there for the rest of my life. However what I found was a Professor of
Church History at an Anglo-Catholic Seminary talking about how we should
reconsider the conclusions of Chalcedon (the fourth ecumenical council) and the
remainder of the ecumenical councils. In
the parishes I attended, I found Anglicanism to be a rather low church affair because
the worship was tailored to have people feel comfortable. The doctrine seemed more like the Reformers
than it did the Fathers. Luther’s Law
Gospel hermeneutic (this hermeneutic is prone to divide Scripture into the
categories of Law, which condemns, and Gospel, which gives life. Luther even opined that the Epistle of James:
“was a right strawy epistle…for it has nothing of the nature of the gospel
about it.”) was on display along with a dash of Calvinism (this was probably
more to a living out of the 39 articles than anything
else). These points grew a little
troubling for me. I was becoming less
and less convinced of the Reformation and the Anglican world is decidedly part
of the Reformation.
Coming
from Southern Baptist land, I liked the Anglican Church in North America. They were conservatives starting a Church
with true doctrine and practice as opposed to the Episcopal Church which well…
um… would allow anyone to believe anything and remain a bishop. As I spent more time, I began to feel as
though the ACNA was simply resetting the theological
capitulation to culture clock back to the 1970’s and doing so through a
functional schism. As a Baptist, schism
is not a negative. However, for an
un-Baptist, schism is troubling, and it gave me a little more pause.
The
breaking point for me was listening to Anglican Unscripted and hearing Kevin
and George talk about how the Anglican Church followed the canons of
Nicaea. Then on Sunday I went to church
and saw a deaconess pushing around an old priest at the altar because he was
moving too slowly for her. As I was
sitting there, I realized that this deaconess would be ordained as a priestess
and that the canons of Nicaea were not followed when they were inconvenient or
at odds with modern sensibilities.
The
very things that I loved about the Anglican Communion was the very thing that
they were doing their best to down play or ignore. I loved the pre-Reformation streams of
thought. However, as I encountered it,
these came through a Reformation grid and a further American evangelical grid. There was a liturgy that at times was strikingly
beautiful, yet was also divorcing itself from the shared worship practices of
the Old Testament and the Early Church.
This was not the place I was looking for. However, during my time there, I began to
appreciate the formative nature of liturgy and written prayers.
No comments:
Post a Comment